In March 1939, Alfred Hitchcock signed a seven year contract with David O. Selznick and would be soon leaving for Hollywood. No longer signed with Gainsborough Studios, his remaining film in England, Jamaica Inn, would be for Mayflower Productions, co-produced by its star Charles Laughton and Hitchcock's first adaptation of a Daphne Du Maurier work.
Set in 1820 Cornwall, Mary Yellan (Maureen O'Hara) is a young Irish woman coming to move in with her aunt following the death of her parents. The stage driver doesn't want anything to do with the Jamaica Inn (Mary's destination) and instead drops her at the estate of the local squire Sir Humphrey Pengallan (Charles Laughton). He gives her a horse and she arrives at the inn to see her Aunt Patience (Marie Ney). At the door, she encounters Patience's husband Joss Merlyn (Leslie Banks), who unknown to Mary is runs a band of wreckers that causes shipwrecks, rob the loot and kill any survivors. In reality, the wreckers are run by Sir Humphrey who uses the proceeds to live an extravagant lifestyle giving Joss and his men a mere pittance of the proceeds. Joss and his men believe that a new member of their group Jem Trehearne (Robert Newton) is stealing from the group and attempt to hang him, but Mary cuts the rope. Mary and Jem make their escape from the inn and we later learn that Jem is an undercover officer investigating the wrecks. Jem then tries to get Sir Humphrey to arrest Joss and the wreckers, not knowing he is their ringleader. Things go amiss and Mary ends up being abducted by Sir Humphrey as hostage for his freedom.
After a string of successes, Jamaica Inn is definitely a bit of a letdown where much of the atmosphere and suspense Du Maurier put in her 1936 book is toned down really leaving a bit of a stuffy film that really didn't hold my interest. There are a few reports that say Hitchcock's directing often clashed with Laughton, who often had his own ideas of his characterizations. Hitchcock said the picture should have been a whodunnit (more like the novel) but having Laughton in the key role spoiled any suspense that it could have created. (Supposedly, Laughton was supposed to play Joss, but opted for the main villain).
Maureen O'Hara is good in her first major role despite Hitchcock's reluctance to hire her. She was hired based Laughton's insistence. Mary is a great character but I think it was more or less not appreciated as much as it should have been. Robert Newton is decent but is more or less miscast where he's best as characters who really dominate the screen (see Oliver Twist (1948), Treasure Island (1950) and Around the World in 80 Days (1956)). Banks gives a good turn as Joss but that character should have had more to do on screen and was set aside by Laughton's hammy performance.
The film was a financial success (making $3.7 million in the US) but didn't sit well with critics who faulted the directing and poor working of the book. Du Maurier reportedly was taken back by the film and tried to take back the rights for Hitchcock's adaptation of her most famous book, Rebecca, but as we'll see next week, we can be thankful she had a change of mind. Contemporary critics have been harsher to the film where it currently has a 55% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, which while not horrendous, but its his fourth lowest rating.
This is also the last feature film where we don't see a Hitchcock cameo or appearance.
The movie is available from several streaming sites due to its public domain status and has recently been restored and put on blu-ray by Cohen Media Group. Du Maurier's source novel can be purchased here.