Sunday, March 22, 2020

14. Murder! (1930)


One film genre that Hitchcock never fully embraced was the murder mystery. Murder! was one of the few that he made which was based on the novel Enter Sir John by Clemence Dane (Winifred Ashton) and Helen Simpson (who would provide the source novel for Hitchcock's 1949 movie Under Capricorn). Reportedly, the novel was the inspiration for a play, but there's not evidence of it being produced unless it was a local repertory.

The movie opens at a theatrical boarding house where Edna Druce is found dead, her head bashed in with a poker. Sitting nearby in a chair with a dazed look is Diana Baring, and the poker lies right next to her. She's tried, convicted and sentenced to hang. One of the jurors is actor Sir John Menier, who despite his vote, is not entirely convinced of Baring's guilt. He works with theater manager Markham and his wife Doucie to uncover the killer.



Hitchcock avoided doing whodunits because it just revolved around the ending and there wasn't much emotion that could be had from that. Murder has the opportunity to be a really good film but just seems to never fulfill its potential. Hitchcock said that much of the dialogue wasn't completed when filming began and he asked the cast to improvise after being told of the scene's scenario. He claimed that using this process, the cast wasn't as spontaneous as he would have preferred and this directing method was abandoned.

The movie does follow the novel closely at times but veers off towards the end (the killer is the same is both mediums). In the book, Sir John is not a jury member but just an observer (the fact that he is a jury member just makes absolutely no sense considering the conflict of interest that he had worked with Diana before the crime was committed). One of the suspects, Handell Fane, is described as eccentric in the novel and in the movie he's a cross dresser.

Like Juno and the Paycock there is a series of long takes with a bunch of talking heads and much of the cleverness of the movie doesn't take place until the last 20 minutes of the film. One sequence that is effective is Sir John and Markham discussing their next move, while we see a montage of Diana pacing her jail cell, a weathervane and the shadow of the gallows on the prison wall. Another memorable scene is while Sir John is shaving, he has an interlude which was accomplished by having a recording of Marshall's voice in the background and the orchestra playing off camera.

Herbert Marshall for me is just too dull as the lead, just seemingly too stuffy and listless (a common observation of him in a good deal of his screen roles). Norah Baring is even worse as the condemned woman just appearing overwhelmed in every scene she's in and not because of the characterization. Edward Chapman and Phyllis Konstam do are very good as the Markhams giving some light comic relief while still being an essential part of the investigation.

The New York Times was indifferent in the review saying the film was inconsistent and Variety said that the film didn't live up to its title and Hitchcock could have interjected a better sex angle into the production. Hitchcock claimed that the film did very well in London but not so much in the provinces. The Variety review also alluded to that the film wouldn't do so well in the USA as it seemed it was made for British audiences.

Hitchcock makes his cameo appearance a little over an hour into the film walking with a female companion, past the boarding house after Sir John and the Markhams leave it following their investigations.

While the movie was being filmed, a German language version, also directed by Hitchcock entitled Mary was being made as dubbing was still not prevalent at the time. A review of that will be in a couple of weeks.

Murder! (and Mary) is available on both DVD and Blu-Ray from Kino-Lorber and can be purchased here. Enter Sir John was a very difficult novel to find and seems to be out of print for some time, so eBay would be a good place to look for a copy.

Sunday, March 15, 2020

13. Juno and the Paycock (1930)


Sean O'Casey's 1924 play made an impression so much that it went to London in November of 1925. Hitchcock upon viewing the play was eager to make it into a movie, but O'Casey had his reservations, but was talked into visiting Hitchcock at Elstree studios (while making Champagne or Blackmail depending on who was telling the story). The two reached an agreement to bring the play to the screen as well as O'Casey writing a new opening scene for the film.

The play (taking place during the Irish Rebellion in 1922) deals with the Boyle family with Captain Boyle (Edward Chapman) who spends more time in the local pub that finding a job, wife Juno (Sara Allgood) and their two children Mary (Kathleen O'Regan) and Johnny (John Laurie), the latter of which lost his arm in bomb attack and is on edge throughout the film. Mary starts dating a lawyer Charlie Bentham (John Longden) who informs Captain Boyle that he has an inheritance coming from an old cousin and the family starts spending frivolously. Unfortunately a bookkeeping error nulls the inheritance and the family has to not only worry about the creditors but all of the friends they shunned while living "the high life".

The movie (by accounts) is a faithful adaptation of the play (Hitchcock's wife Alma Reville is credited as the screenwriter) and Allgood reprises her role from the original production. (Barry Fitzgerald, who played Captain Boyle originally in Dublin, has a smaller role as an orator at the beginning of the film, marking his movie debut). The cast does a great job here and the scenes do move along. The fault unfortunately lies in Hitchcock's directing with an overabundance of long takes that don't make the film look more like a filming of a play performance rather than a movie.

Critics took note of that as well, with the Times saying it had great acting but Hitchcock seemed to forget what medium he was working in. The Manchester Guardian said the film wasn't as good as Hitchcock's previous movie (Blackmail) proclaiming a lack of imagination in the grouping and cutting but some moments of beauty and good uses of sound (keep in mind that this film was Hitchcock's first fully realized foray into talking pictures).

Despite his enthusiasm for making the film, Hitchcock seemed disappointed by it telling Francois Truffaut that despite loving the source material, he couldn't turn it into cinema. He later told the director that he would rather not distort a famous work just to make it appear cinematic.

Juno and the Paycock is one of many of Hitchcock's films that's in the public domain. Despite a print existing in the British Film Institute, there doesn't seem to be any rush for a restoration.

12. Elstree Calling (1930)



Some stars made the transition into talking pictures quite easily, some had problems with the microphone, some had accents that didn't quite cut it with the characters they portrayed. Movie studios went into a tizzy advertising that the stars they've been enjoying for years could not only talk, but sing as well. Elstree Calling is an example of the campaign studios tried to advertise their talent. The movie is nothing more than a series of comedy and musical skits with a cast including those presently at studio British International Pictures as well as London music halls. (MGM made their own version The Hollywood Revue of 1929 and Paramount did Paramount on Parade)

Now what would Alfred Hitchcock's involvement with the movie. Well its open to speculation. The credited director is Adrian Brunel and Hitchcock is listed as a director of sketches and interpolated items. The "interpolated items" consists of a running gag in between the sketches of a man (Gordon Harker) who is trying to watch the sketches on this new gizmo called a television set. Brunel claimed in his autobiography that Hitchcock directed those bits along with a "thriller" sketch starring Jameson Thomas and a Taming of the Shrew spoof with Donald Calthrop and Anna May Wong (Brunel said that he first shot the spoof but Hitchcock was brought in to reshoot the bit when producers found Brunel's work not funny enough).

Personally the "thriller" sketch is the best of the three relying on a dumb gag that I think was old in 1930. (Buster Keaton used the same gag spoofing William S. Hart in the 1922 short The Frozen North). The Taming of the Shrew spoof isn't really that funny and wastes Anna May Wong's talent. The TV repair sketches are as nondescript as you can get.


All in all, if you enjoy watching Vitaphone shorts on TCM or through Warner Archive, you'll enjoy Elstree Calling. Lily Morris is great in both sketches that she's in, Will Fyffe is enjoyable to watch in his and its pretty interesting to see the use of color in 4 sketches. Granted there are some misses. Emcee Tommy Handley makes you wonder who he was blackmailing in order for him to be cast. The Three Eddies in blackface (even though they were actually black) definitely won't fly today.